NUR 2811L (Professional Nursing Leadership NUR2811C)

MDC BLSON T.M. 11/2019 QEP Leadership Writing Prompt

School of Nursing QEP Writing Prompt

NUR 2811L (Professional Nursing Leadership NUR2811C) For this course, you will write a scholarly paper on Nursing Philosophy. Utilizing the four domains within the nursing metaparadigm you will include the following:

• A definition of the four domains: Nursing, Environment, Health and Person

• Your personal definition of each domain and how these fit into your philosophy of nursing.

• Compare and contrast the philosophies of Miami Dade College Benjamin Leon School of Nursing and at least one hospital.

• Conclude by summarizing and reflecting on what was learned from the assignment and how it will impact your practice in the future.

NUR 2811C Domains

1. Nursing

2. Environment

3. Health

4. Person

Requirements:

o Your paper must be APA format and at least 750 words not to exceed 1000 words.

o Double space your paper and use Times New Roman standard 12-point font.

o Proofread your paper; visit and present proof of seeing a writing tutor before submitting your paper to “Turn-it-in”.

o A minimum of two (2) scholarly references (ex. journal articles) must be used. APA format must be used in citing and referencing sources.

MDC BLSON 1/2020 QEP Grading Rubric T.M

MIAMI DADE COLLEGE BENJAMIN LEON SCHOOL OF NURSING

QEP GRADING RUBRIC

Criteria Score-Exemplary (A) 18.5-20%

Score-Proficient (B) 16.9-18.4%

Score-Developing (C) 15.3-16.8%

Score-Emerging (D) 13.7-15.2%

Score-Deficient (F) 0-13.6%

Introduction States topic thoroughly with a well-developed definitive statement which is consistently the focal point throughout the paper.

States the topic clearly with adequate direction for the paper and is the focal point for most of the paper.

States topic but is too vague or unclear and focal point not maintained throughout the paper.

The topic is not clearly defined and lacks focus throughout.

Fails to identify the topic and lacks focus throughout.

Content/Application of Scholarly Resources

At least two (2) cited, scholarly sources which are current, (within the last 5-10 years) and relevant, to the topic. There is analysis, (compare/contrast) of the topic.

At least two (2) cited, scholarly sources which are current, (within the last 5-10 years) and relevant, to the topic. However, there is limited, or no analysis, (compare and contrast) of the topic.

Only one (1) cited, scholarly source which is current, (within the last 5-10 years) relevant, to the topic. However, there is limited, or no analysis, (compare and contrast) of the topic.

Only one (1) cited, scholarly source which is current, (within the last 5-10 years) relevant, to the topic. However, there is no analysis, (compare and contrast) of the topic.

There is no cited scholarly source. There is no analysis, (compare and contrast) of the topic.

 

 

MDC BLSON 1/2020 QEP Grading Rubric T.M

Conclusion Thoroughly Summarizes what was learned from this assignment and the particular topic. Includes if new knowledge was gained.

Clearly summarizes what was learned from the assignment and the particular topic. Includes if new knowledge was gained.

Mostly summarizes what was learned from the assignment and the particular topic. Does not include whether or not new knowledge was gained.

Minimal summary of the topic.

There is a lack of summary of the topic.

Writing Content is well organized, logical, and clearly stated with little, or no grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors.

Content is mostly organized, logical and clearly stated and with minimal grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors.

Content is somewhat organized, several ideas are off topic, several grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

Content is fairly organized, many ideas are off topic, many grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

Content is disorganized with numerous grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

APA/Content/ Quality of Research

Compliant with current APA formatting guidelines. References are appropriate and properly cited within the paper and on the reference page. All references are included. Minimal errors are noted.

Good use current APA formatting guidelines. References are mostly appropriate and well cited within the paper and on the reference page. Occasional errors are noted.

Fair use of current APA formatting guidelines. Provides references that may not be relevant or appropriately cited. All sources cited are not present on the reference page. Multiple errors are noted.

Current APA formatting guidelines were minimally used. All sources cited are not present on the reference page or not cited. Many errors noted.

Current APA formatting guidelines were not used. No references cited. Numerous errors noted.

Total Points: Possible Points: 100 A (93-100) B (85-92) C (77-84) D (76-69) F (69 and below)